Utility vs. Beauty

52weeksofux:

A good designer always works to keep the form, function and the aesthetic quality of a design in balance throughout the life of a project. Just because something looks good doesn’t mean its useful. And just because something is useful does not make it beautiful.

More often than we want to admit, we use glitz and glam—or worse, the current popular design trend—to hide the areas where we simply dont have an elegant solution appropriate to the problem at hand. It is too easy to get caught in the trap of focusing on “making it pretty” without giving consideration to the actual purpose of the design.

At the same time, a designer should understand that even the most utilitarian product can benefit from subtle, refined aesthetic treatments and turn what is a dull and boring, yet necessary, task into something enjoyable and engaging.

The most elegant solution will yield a design that is gracefully tempered with restraint and precision—both useful and beautiful.

Via 52 Weeks of UX
  1. lovefools reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  2. frogpond reblogged this from niub
  3. niub reblogged this from jjjjasmine
  4. mikuen reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  5. ramymajouji reblogged this from 52weeksofux and added:
    Original post by 52weeksofux.
  6. codecanyon reblogged this from hiten
  7. katriin reblogged this from sebastianwaters
  8. hiten reblogged this from sebastianwaters
  9. sebastianwaters reblogged this from 52weeksofux and added:
    UX: Utility vs. Beauty
  10. kleinebeer reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  11. ericluan reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  12. jjjjasmine reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  13. moocha reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  14. jingu reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  15. interfaceaddiction reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  16. heatherswaineflu reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  17. jonnyfreds reblogged this from 52weeksofux
  18. 52weeksofux posted this